larch
Just watched the race 1 in Darwin where the favourite and a 10/1 pop were raced by the the same trainer. Kalmar, had been beaten by 19 and 20 l at its last wo starts and Sportbet had it around 10/1. In the final few moments it was backed into 4.4. it led and won easily.
The Fav, Kowloon Kid had won its past two. It hovered around 3.5 fav and in the last few minutes blew to 4.4/. It missed the start and never figured in the race. Makes me wonder. I would hope the stewards look into this .
I sometimes have to wonder why I have a punt. Have a look at race one at Gawler today. I backed Old Cobber and it did not run a place. Justin Potter put in one of the worst rides I have seen for a long time on a favourite . I know the jockey can be the biggest variable in a race but you have to wonder sometimes
Whilst it may lift the quality of the race, it is a fair kick in the pants for any pre post punters.
She was not nominated and punters have placed prepost bets without a Winx in the field. I would be annoyed to say the least if I thought I got a BARGAIN OF 5/1 ON Alizee to find that Winx has been added to the field.
Bookies are in for a bonanza. Layed the field at incredibly short odds and Joe Punter only finds out Winx is in the field at the last minute. This is not on?? I know there is a risk in pre post betting but that relates to your horse not running, not the addition of a wild card (never actually in the nominations).
I have to wonder how many of the Weir staff will end up implicated in this saga. One has to assume that many staff were involved in the use of the jiggers and jockeys had to have known of the training method. As yet no-one appears to be talking but that may be why the charges of refusing to co-operate with stewards may have been laid.
Has anyone else had any problems???
Any one else have problems.
2nd v 1st was upheld so the placings were reversed( ie the original winner was placed behind the original runner up.)
5th v 2nd was dismissed.
My question is
What would the final placing have been if 5th v 2nd had also been upheld.
Would the original 2nd have been placed behind the 5th horse (leaving the original winner again at the head of the placings)
Mick or the owners seem to have placed all eggs in one basket and its a very difficult basket to fill.
The Cleaner won't run again until the Cox Plate. I would have thought the Turnbull today was an easy assignment with the Cox Plate on in 3 weeks.
The Cleaner will miss out on today and I would have to wonder whether he will be rock hard fit for the Cox Plate (and he will need to be).
Talkback Forum
Racing And Sports offers our users the chance to get involved with spirited discussion about major racing issues on your Talkback Forum. They may include chatter about racing matters, issues relating to the website, sporting conversation, betting matters and more. Please be aware that Racing And Sports now moderates Talkback to ensure posting guidelines are adhered to. The views expressed on Talkback are those of the writer and not necessarily those of Racing And Sports. You must be a registered user to write postings or send messages to other users.
Sign-in with Credentials
Latest Posts
-
loges2 More than a month -
Oldman More than a month -
dhaulagiri More than a month -
Oldman More than a month -
jet More than a month -
loges2 More than a month -
dhaulagiri More than a month -
Sydeston More than a month -
dhaulagiri More than a month -
Dagz More than a month -
Oldman More than a month -
loges2 More than a month -
dhaulagiri More than a month -
oldtimer More than a month -
hitensile More than a month -
The Mighty Quinn More than a month -
dhaulagiri More than a month -
Euraman More than a month -
dhaulagiri More than a month -
Oldman More than a month -
dhaulagiri More than a month -
hitensile More than a month -
dhaulagiri More than a month -
hitensile More than a month -
Branded More than a month -
dhaulagiri More than a month -
One Perfect Day More than a month -
dhaulagiri More than a month -
hitensile More than a month -
dhaulagiri More than a month